SPONSORED CONTENT

Jury Finds Waterford Public Schools Retaliated Against Whistleblower Teacher for Reporting Threat of School Gun Violence

Jury Finds Waterford Public Schools Retaliated Against Whistleblower Teacher for Reporting Threat of School Gun Violence

​ [[{"value":"

Southfield, Michigan – As a special education teacher at Waterford Public Schools’ Riverside Elementary, Katherine Albright reasonably expected the school district to appropriately address her report about a disturbing threat of gun violence. Instead, a jury found that the school district unlawfully retaliated against her, ending her employment just 11 days after she reported a school shooting threat made by one of her students.

According to a lawsuit filed in May 2023 against Waterford Public Schools, one of Ms. Albright’s students handed her a disturbing and threatening drawing depicting the student shooting Ms. Albright with a handgun. The student also made chilling threats, “kill teacher,” “I hurt teacher,” and “I want to hurt you in your head and your heart.”

For her own protection and the safety of the entire school, court documents show Ms. Albright immediately informed Riverside Elementary’s principal of these alarming threats. Following her report, the plaintiff urged the school’s administration to implement safety measures, such as checking the student’s backpack at pick up and drop off, to make sure the student did not act on the vivid school shooting threat.

Despite her persistent efforts to safeguard students, faculty, staff, and the community, Ms. Albright alleged the school district refused to address her concerns. Eleven days after the plaintiff made her initial report, she says the district delivered her an ultimatum: either resign your position or be terminated. Left with no practical option, Ms. Albright had no choice but to resign.

After over a year of litigation, the case went to trial. On September 20, 2024, after three and one-half days of testimony and evidence, an Oakland County Circuit Court jury found that Waterford Public Schools violated the Michigan Whistleblowers’ Protection Act by retaliating against Ms. Albright for filing her report of the threat of school gun violence. The jury awarded Ms. Albright $134,090.55 in damages, including compensation for lost wages and benefits, and damage to her career, professional reputation, and professional esteem.

“We are grateful to the jury for delivering justice for our client,” said attorney Tad T. Roumayah of Sommers Schwartz, P.C., who represents Ms. Albright. “It is outrageous that Waterford Public Schools – just 20 miles from Oxford High where a student killed four students and injured seven – blatantly punished a teacher for reporting a disturbing threat of school gun violence made by one of her students. The jury’s verdict sent a clear message that school districts will face legal consequences if they choose to retaliate against teachers and staff who sound the alarm on school safety threats.”

CASE INFORMATION
Michigan Circuit Court County of Oakland
Albright v. Waterford School District
Case No. 23-200322-CD

Sommers Schwartz, P.C., a law firm in Southfield, Michigan, represents individuals in Michigan and across the country who have been harmed because of workplace disputes and loss of employment; medical errors, defective products, loss of employment, and other forms of negligence or intentional injury; and businesses involved in complex litigation matters that jeopardize their existence.

Sommers Schwartz, P.C.
1 Towne Square #1700, Southfield, MI 48076
(248) 355-0300
https://www.sommerspc.com/employment/whistle-blower/
Press Contact : Media Contact

Distributed by Law Firm Newswire"}]] 

This story is published through a partnership with Law Firm Newswire. The editorial staff of Bigger Law Firm Magazine did not contribute to this article. The views expressed are solely those of the source of the news release and do not reflect the views of Law Firm Newswire or Bigger Law Firm Magazine. Questions related to this story should be directed to the media contact referenced in the article. 

Law Firm Newswire

MORE STORIES

Lawyers used ChatGPT

Lawyers in New York Used ChatGPT and Now Face Possible Sanctions

Several lawyers are under scrutiny and face potential sanctions after utilizing OpenAI’s advanced language model, ChatGPT, for the drafting of legal documents submitted in a New York federal court. The attention surrounding this matter stems from the erroneous citation of non-existent or irrelevant cases by ChatGPT. The adoption of AI in legal practice is not…

Google Changes the Rules for AI Content

Google has Changed their Mind About AI Generated Content

Their change in terms essentially amounts to, “Yes, you can use AI tools to help create quality content but it had better be good.”

Law Firm Marketing Director

What Makes a Great Law Firm Marketing Director?

In an ever-changing legal landscape, an exceptional Law Firm Marketing Director stays ahead of the curve. They adopt a visionary perspective to navigate through intricate legal landscapes and drive the firm’s marketing initiatives. This involves identifying market trends, predicting client needs, and planning innovative marketing strategies to secure a competitive edge.