SPONSORED CONTENT
Sommers Schwartz Attorneys Secure $800,000 Federal Court Jury Verdict In Groundbreaking Workplace Retaliation and Disability Discrimination Case
Detroit, Michigan – Attorneys Tad T. Roumayah and Jenna H. Sheena of Sommers Schwartz, PC, a premier law firm out of Detroit, Michigan, together with Attorney Charis (Lee) Williams of the Lee Legal Group, PLLC, spearheaded a lawsuit that resulted in a staggering $800,000 jury verdict for a Genesee County, Michigan Road Commission (GCRC) employee.
The plaintiff, who is Black, reported to the GCRC’s Managing Director. Though blind in her right eye, she could work with reading and computer navigation help from a full-time administrative assistant, which was a disability accommodation granted by her employer for a period of two years.
According to the lawsuit, the plaintiff filed written complaints to the GCRC Board detailing the Managing Director’s racial discrimination and harassment against her. After the plaintiff submitted her race discrimination complaint, the Managing Director subjected her to adverse employment action by placing her on a 2-week unpaid suspension. Plaintiff then lodged another complaint of race discrimination, harassment, and retaliation against the Managing Director after her suspension. In response, the Managing Director placed the plaintiff on administrative leave.
The plaintiff brought an employment discrimination and retaliation lawsuit in federal court, and the GCRC reinstated her back to work the next day. The retaliation continued, however, when the Managing Director refused the plaintiff’s request to fill the administrative assistant position to accommodate her visual disability after her previous assistant was promoted, which effectively removed her disability accommodation.
At trial, the plaintiff argued that the Managing Director retaliated against her for submitting statutorily protected race discrimination complaints and that his continuing adverse treatment violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. Section 1981, the Michigan Elliot-Larsen Civil Rights Act, and the Michigan Persons With Disabilities Civil Rights Act.
The plaintiff further presented evidence that the Managing Director illegally failed to accommodate her visual disability by allowing the administrative assistant position to become vacant and refusing to fill the position, thus removing her disability accommodation in violation of the Michigan Persons With Disabilities Civil Rights Act.
Of the $800,000 verdict, the jury awarded $355,000 to compensate the plaintiff for her retaliation claim and $445,000 for the failure to accommodate.
Attorney Tad T. Roumayah, who represents the plaintiff, said that his client is thankful that justice was served. “This important jury verdict sends a clear message to employers that illegal discrimination and retaliation should never be tolerated, and that fairness and equality should define every workplace.”
This landmark case showcases Sommers Schwartz’s unyielding commitment to upholding the rights of employees and discrimination victims. Their remarkable victory sends a powerful message — no form of discrimination, be it based on race, disability, or retaliation, will be tolerated in the workplace. Through their tireless work and dedication, Sommers Schwartz continues to champion the rights of individuals against oppressive forces, reaffirming their position as one of the top law firms in Detroit.
CASE INFORMATION
Poplar v. Genesee County Road Commission
U.S. District Court – Eastern District of Michigan
Case: 2:21-CV-12568-NGE-JJCG
Sommers Schwartz is a powerhouse litigation firm made up of experienced personal injury lawyers, medical malpractice attorneys, commercial and business law attorneys, and employee rights lawyers fighting for unpaid wages and overtime. The law firm serves clients across the country from its offices in Michigan and California.
Sommers Schwartz, P.C.
1 Towne Square #1700
Southfield, MI 48076
(248) 355-0300
https://www.sommerspc.com/
Press Contact : Media Contact
Distributed by Law Firm Newswire
This story is published through a partnership with Law Firm Newswire. The editorial staff of Bigger Law Firm Magazine did not contribute to this article. The views expressed are solely those of the source of the news release and do not reflect the views of Law Firm Newswire or Bigger Law Firm Magazine. Questions related to this story should be directed to the media contact referenced in the article.
LATEST STORIES
MORE STORIES